mgs
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: Creation of MGs Newsgroup?

To: "'MG List'" <mgs@Autox.Team.Net>
Subject: RE: Creation of MGs Newsgroup?
From: DANIEL RAY <danray@bluegrass.net>
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 1998 11:52:20 -0600
I'll second that. This list serves the purpose quite well and yowould probably 
run into the same thing as the attempt to get people on IRC.
Dan

----------
From:   John McEwen
Sent:   Tuesday, January 27, 1998 9:24 PM
To:     Andy Ramm
Cc:     mgs@autox.team.net
Subject:        Re: Creation of MGs Newsgroup?

Andy, I think we've got a good thing going.  If it ain't broke don't fix it.

John


>I've been thinking of proposing an MGs usenet
>group to augment the listserv we have here.  This
>listserv is incredibly valuable.  For me,
>mgs@autox.team.net is a daily ritual.  However,
>there may be listers for whom a usenet group is
>more convenient, or those MG owners on the net
>that do not know about team.net that might also
>benefit from a newsgroup.
>
>I'd like to know what people think before
>proceeding, so please give me your feedback.  If
>list members think that an MGs usenet group would
>be detrimental to the list, I absolutely won't
>begin the process.
>
>I'm hoping the cross-pollination of a listserv and
>a newsgroup would be a positive thing.  If anyone
>has a historic perspective about what has been
>done in the past, I'd like to know about that too.
>
>Second, should I do a complete proposal for
>something like rec.autos.mg, or should I short
>circuit that and create an alt.mgs list?  Again,
>I'll do nothing without consulting this list
>first.
>
>All comments are welcome!
>
>Cheers,
>
>Andy
>--
>
>
>
>
>Andy Ramm
>A silver face in a tweed world.
>Remove obvious spam filter from email address when
>replying.
>"What we play is the blues, straight from the
>delta, and I believe we'll make it on that,"  B.B.
>King
>
>
>By US Code Title 47, Sec.227(a)(2)(B),
>Sec.227(b)(1)(C) and Sec.227(b)(3)(C), it is
>unlawful to send any unsolicited advertisement to
>this equipment.  A violation of the aforementioned
>Section is punishable by action to recover actual
>monetary loss, or $500, whichever is greater, for
>each violation.






<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>