Curious...so how many policemen did it take to beat up on Rodney King? The
point is that if it can be done, it will be done..sooner or later.
SOmewhere. Maybe not you, maybe not next year...but somewhen. When will it
be that those of us who choose not to be TAC'e are ostracized with finger
pointing that has an underlying snicker that we are afraid to have our cars
TACed because we know they are not real Tigers? It is soming one day
soon...trust me on this.
mayf
----- Original Message -----
From: "Kathy and Erich Coiner" <kathy.coiner@gte.net>
To: "DrMayf" <drmayf@teknett.com>
Cc: <tigers@autox.team.net>
Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 7:39 PM
Subject: Re: Alpine Conversion
> See comments within your reply.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "DrMayf" <drmayf@teknett.com>
> To: "Kathy and Erich Coiner" <kathy.coiner@gte.net>; <DJoh797014@aol.com>
> Cc: <tigers@autox.team.net>
> Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 8:10 AM
> Subject: Re: Alpine Conversion
>
>
> > Well, not being a lawyer...
> > but what you are mentioning is the process used to TAC a car. The
lawsuit
> > would probably be against a person who used the process errantly or
> > knowingly to defraud someone. Say for instance, that an inspector found
a
> > really good tiger but decided that it was an Alger in order to try and
> > purchase it very cheaply.
> First it takes 3 inspectors to agree the car is a Tiger and put a sticker
> on the car. That will reduce the likely hood of your scenario quite a
bit.
> Second, the owner of the car comes to TAC to have it inspected. TAC does
not
> go out and look at cars unsolicited.
>
>
> Or get it sold to a friend at a really reduced
> > price. Or that the inspector had a case of rash with the owner and told
> him
> > the car was not real. This is a case where both the inspector and the
> > underwriting agency could both be found guilty because of the inspectors
> > actions and the lack of monitoring by the agency who does the
inspections.
>
> Again the system in place requires 3 people to conspire together to make
> this happen.
>
> > There are many ways for someone to skin a cat. As far as I am concerned.
I
> > have had mine since 1967 and it has not been TAC'd and I consider it a
non
> > event or action. SHould i sell my car and have the buyer tell me it is
not
> a
> > Tiger because it has not been TAC'd then I might consider suit againt
the
> > organization for failing to disclose that they are not the authority nor
> any
> > kind of governing body.
> >
> > just my 2 cents worth, and who cares anyway..
>
> You did enough to reply :)
|