autox
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Fw: minimum weight requirement

To: Autox <autox@autox.team.net>
Subject: Re: Fw: minimum weight requirement
From: "Mark J. Andy" <marka@telerama.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 11:34:36 -0400 (EDT)
Howdy,

On Mon, 21 Oct 2002, Charles Cox wrote:
> >>>This is the argument that seems to come up as to why it has been
> chosen not to weigh the car with driver. What anyone arguing that
> point seems to not understand is that it is the responsibility of the
> sanctioning organization to present a level playing field for the
> competitors, not to do the competitor's work. No one is forced to do
> anything to their car by any rule. The rules (typically) allow you to
> make changes in order to be more competitive. It is possible to remedy
> the difference in weight of two driver cars by adding ballast,
> therefore it is up to the competitor to do it or not (ballast it for
> the lighter driver and the heavier runs heavy is one other option) and
> the event production to figure out how to verify it. Who polices any
> of the rules? There are many other forms of motorsport with multiple
> drivers and they deal with it fine. Further, it appears the minority
> of cars are 2 driver cars. Why should the majority be burdened by the
> needs of the minority?<<<

I don't have as much money as some of my competitors.  Is it the
sanctioning body's responsibility to level that as well?

Rules should be chosen to both level the playing field as well as not
inconvience competitors overmuch.  Many folks have weighed in and said
that weighing with driver would be a PITA for two driver cars, something
that is a staple of autocrossing.  You don't have to agree, of course.

I also wonder about the "minority" statement above.  Even if its true
(afterall, 49% is still a "minority"), so what?  This "burden" that you're
so up in arms about seems to me to be a pretty minor thing.

> >>>Being "grassroots" has nothing to do with properly written rules,
> nor does the presence or lack of prize money.  How can you play within
> the rules if they aren't clear or properly written? That is what
> causes these types of debates or argument and can be easily remedied
> with proper language in the rule book.<<<

You seem to be one of the only people that isn't clear on what's in the
book right now.  Suggest clarifications if you'd like, but at least
recognize that most of us are fine with what's there right now.  Saying
that the rules "aren't clear or properly written" is patently untrue, at
least for most of us.

Mark

///  unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net  or try
///  http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo
///  Partial archives at http://www.team.net/archive


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>