spitfires
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: On MailList politics and knowing who's ones friends are...

To: "Richard B Gosling" <Gosling_Richard_B@perkins.com>,
Subject: Re: On MailList politics and knowing who's ones friends are...
From: "Jeff McNeal" <jmcneal@ohms.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2000 10:58:36 -0700
"And let no man put asunder, the joining of this man and woman, in holy
matrimony, now and forever, amen".

:-)

Sorry.  Poor form, I know...  But somehow through all of this, I'm seeing a
bit of humor.  And they say you British have a peculiar sense of humor!

Best wishes,

Jeff in San Diego

'67 RHD Spitfire Mk3 aka "Mrs. Jones"
Jeff's Classic '67 Spitfire Mk3 site & Vintage Spitfire Webring
http://www.ohms.com/spitfire/spitfire.shtml
home of the NEW Totally Triumph Auction
"By Triumph enthusiasts, for Triumph enthusiasts"
http://www.ohms.com/cgi-bin/TRauction.cgi
and... The Triumph Autos/Parts Wanted Listings
http://www.ohms.com/cgi-bin/TRwanted.cgi
The Vintage Spitfire Forum -- moderated and friendly
http://www.ohms.com/cgi-bin/spitforum.cgi
...plus a few other surprises!

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *


----- Original Message -----
From: Richard B Gosling <Gosling_Richard_B@perkins.com>
To: spitlist <spitlist@gte.net>
Cc: Laura.G <Laura.G@141.com>; spitfires <spitfires@autox.team.net>
Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2000 9:15 AM
Subject: Re: On MailList politics and knowing who's ones friends are...


>
> As usual with these things, it seems that it is everyone's fault a little,
and
>  no-one's fault completely.
>
> Joe, I believe you may have treated Laura with some level of insensitivity
in
>  your comments to her.  Whatever your intentions, it is clear that your
words
>  have genuinely upset Laura badly.  I find it hard to believe she would
turn
>  her back on a community that she has been so much a part of, purely as
some
>  sort of attention-seeking tantrum.  Maybe good intentions, but badly
phrased
>  to someone who we know can take things very personally.
>
> Laura, I suspect that you may have over-reacted to Joe's comments.  They
may
>  have appeared hurtful, but the impression I get from what he subsequently
said
>  is that his intentions were honourable - he seemed concerned that, to him
and
>  possibly others, your claims were making you look foolish.  He may be
right,
>  he may be wrong - I have never stopped to question your claims, without
having
>  seen Nigel, and I have never considered you foolish - but his concern
appears
>  to me that he wants to save you from embarrassment.  You clearly are
capable
>  of standing up for yourself and do not want to be saved by anyone, but I
>  believe Joe's intentions were merely misplaced good ones, not
deliberately
>  hurtful - at least before the slanging match started up.
>
> Laura, I hope you will return to this list, I'm sure most of us appreciate
your
>  contributions and humour, and those who don't, well they should just keep
it
>  to themselves.  No-one gets on with everyone in this world, and for the
sake
>  of the general peace it is best just to stay away from those we don't get
on
>  with.
>
> Everyone, whether or not Laura re-joins, can we put this behind us now,
and
>  continue as friends as we all were before.  Yes, I know that makes me a
>  hypocrite, since it was me who dug up what should already have been
buried and
>  forgotten - for this I apologise.
>
> Enough now.
>
> Richard
>


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>