Which is why the TVR 2500M is even more drool worthy in my opinion. Loads
stiffer tube chassis wrapped in fiberglass. Un-equal length double A-arm
suspension front and rear and the mechanical symphony of the TR inline six
under the bonnet.
Of course I want both my TR6 and a 2500M. There is just no pleasing some of
us.
Shawn J. Loseke
1972 TR6
Fort Collins, CO
http://www.loseke.net/shawn
>===== Original Message From "Robert M. Lang" <lang@isis.mit.edu> =====
>On Mon, 17 Nov 2003, Philip E. Barnes wrote:
>
>> The one area that needs the most work in a TR6 is chassis rigidity, or lack
>> thereof. Current production cars are extraordinarily stiff, which makes the
>> handling quite predictable. You'd have to go a long way to make a TR6 that
>> stiff, i.e tube frame or the like.
>
>Agreed.
>
>I've posted to this list and others about the Triumph TR6 "flexible flyer"
>characteristics.
|