autox
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: ST @ Nationals

To: LARRY97ACR@aol.com
Subject: Re: ST @ Nationals
From: Paul Foster <pfoster@gdi.net>
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 1999 13:02:07 -0400
LARRY97ACR@aol.com wrote:
> 
> Now, Now
> 
> What is wrong with street tire classes.
> Some of us can only afford one car and like to make some mods to our cars.
> Why should I have to run in CSP if all I have done is change my Front Motor
> Mount because the factory one is too soft. Why should I have to have 2 sets
> of tires and wheels to run in a Stock Class. My own feeling is that stock
> class should never have allowed R tires in. I moved to ST because I no chance
> without R tires in DS and ST allowed me to make small mods to car without
> spending $1000 for the wheels/tires.
> 
> Yes, when I can afford it and have a second car I will probably run in a mod
> or prepared class, but ST lets me run now.

Well, this argument has been on team.net about a thosand times in the
last 5 years but I guess one more time won't hurt. (Although a FAQ with
common subjects such as this would help. Then I could just say RTFF
#1.3...)

1) You will have to shave street tires anyway to avoid chunking them.
2) The top competitors will shave them _and_ swap wheels at the event
anyway because this will give them an edge over people who actually run
on true street tires.
3) Pseudo R tires will appear - like BFG KDs - that are both more
expensive and provide less grip than R tires but are still faster than
actual street tires.
4) R tires are actually much cheaper than good street tires because they
are subsidized to some extent (except Hoosiers).
5) We should support the R tire suppliers. They provide needed
sponsorship.
6) R tires will make you feel like a racer. (Subjective I know but it is
a real thrill to get your first set.)

Besides, there are a lot better candidates for new classes besides
openly pandering to the rice burner market. ;-)

IMHO of course,

Paul Foster

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>