No we are getting testy about people telling us in no uncertain terms that we
don't know what the hell we are talking about.
Joe
Brad Hofmann wrote:
>
> Are we getting a little testy about the "business ethics" subject?
> This seemed like such a nice list just a short time ago. The last
> time I checked a business owner had the right to set his own
> policies and procedure as long as he didn't break the law in
> doing so. Sounds like this business has their policies posted, so
> it does not appear that there any surprises to be had. If you don't
> like the way someone does business, don't trade with them. If you
> do business with them anyway, and are not satisfied with the outcome,
> who's fault is it then?
>
> I much rather hear more substantive talk...like young women attracted
> to guys in LBC's, or at least attracted to the LBC, anyway. I like to
> live vicariously through you guys who actually have RUNNING cars.
>
> Cheers
>
> Brad
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <DRSkruffy@aol.com>
> To: <triumphs@autox.team.net>
> Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2000 9:02 AM
> Subject: Re: business ethics
>
> >
> > In a message dated 5/31/00 1:59:55 PM !!!First Boot!!!, spitlist@gte.net
> > writes:
> >
> > << I'm not going to argue with someone who just says, "I disagree" without
> > citing any rationale why. So, consider this thread ended.
> >
> > Joe
> > >>
> >
> > Good for you, I'm not going to argue with someone assuming that because
> they
> > did something at TI it must be a universal truth. I prefer to rely on
> facts.
|