triumphs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: TR6s vs. whatever

To: "Joe Donovan" <jdonovan@mediaone.net>, " TR list" <triumphs@autox.team.net>
Subject: Re: TR6s vs. whatever
From: TeriAnn Wakeman <twakeman@cruzers.com>
Date: Wed, 16 May 01 08:53:41 -0700
> My '73 TR-6 is not really a '70's car but a '50's car.   The
>appeal is the beauty of the design and the primitive mechanical character of
>the machine.

Golly, your TR6 has roll up windows a softer suspension and all kinds of 
luxury widgets that my daily driver does not have.

> At 40 mph in third gear it feels on the edge.

At 60 MPH in third under (Don't try this with a stock engine kids), my 
TR3 is just itching to pounce.

> A modern performance machine like the A6 isn't even working hard unless you 
are in
>danger of losing your license to the State Police.

The older roadsters are so much fun, even at much lower speeds.  I'm 
still wondering why people bother spending huge sums of money on the new 
ones.

Triumph roadsters were built and sold to be daily drivers when they were 
new.  And they do just as good a job at it now as they did back then if 
they are kept in good mechanical shape.

>And let's face it, they're just plain fun to drive!

So why drive anything else???????????

TeriAnn Wakeman               Marigold Ltd.
Santa Cruz, California        Web design, site updating, testing
webmaster@overlander.net      search engine optimization, graphics
                              and more

http://www.overlander.net/Marigold/index.html

///
///  triumphs@autox.team.net mailing list
///  To unsubscribe send a plain text message to majordomo@autox.team.net
///  with nothing in it but
///
///     unsubscribe triumphs
///
///


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>