vintage-race
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: Re: GT6 suspension mods

To: David.Laver@msdw.com, JWoesvra@aol.com, lwdent@fwi.com
Subject: RE: Re: GT6 suspension mods
From: Rick Yocum <Rick.Yocum@mail.sprint.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2000 13:26:10 -0400
--openmail-part-01795178-00000001
Content-Disposition: inline

Jack,

Slow.  My Nova is slow?  OK, it's slow, but at least it's ugly and 
ill-handling!

Rick

-----Original Message-----
From: JWoesvra [mailto:JWoesvra@aol.com]
Sent: Monday, August 07, 2000 11:56 AM
To: David.Laver; lwdent
Cc: JWoesvra; trnut; Gt6steve; fot; vintage-race
Subject: Re: GT6 suspension mods


In a message dated 08/07/2000 10:17:47 AM Eastern Daylight Time, 
David.Laver@msdw.com writes:

<< Interesting debate. We prize above all other cars on the grid those 
with
 period history running as close to the spec they were at.  What if we 
now
 know they were illegal in period?  What if the illegal mod protects 
original
 components from inevitable breakage?
  >>

As technical director for SVRA I have extensive files on period race 
cars and 
specifications. Our group 6 in particular has a requirement for each 
car to 
have documented period history. Many of the files contain documentation 
on 
specifications that were illegal at the time.

We have a 7/8th size Camaro. We have several acid dipped bodies. We 
have 
fastback Mustangs running B/P as GT350s in period. We have a Chevy Nova 
that 
ran a 350 engine even though 302 was the limit. The car was still so 
slow 
that nobody ever checked! We have Ford rear ends that were under GM 
bodies 
before that was officially allowed. We have an XKE with a Corvette diff.

These are just a few that I remember without looking them up. The point 
is, 
racers did many things to their cars, and for many reasons. First, a 
car had 
to be able to finish, and then perhaps you could probe the limits for 
speed 
and handling.

Remember, this is historic racing. Don't forget the "historic" part of 
it. We 
are not here to correct the oversights of many long gone tech 
inspectors.

Along a similar trail, we should also make it unnecessary to "cheat" 
when we 
find new solutions to old reliability and safety issues. I would rather 
err 
on the side of fixing a problem than forcing someone into a predicament 
that 
requires covert action or going without to satisfy "original" 
specifications, 
what ever that is in racing.

I have spent the last 25 years debating the value of originality. I 
have been 
on both sides of nearly every issue. I believe I have directed SVRA to 
a 
position of stability and sanity concerning rules and regulations. What 
we 
will let you do we have put in writing and made the documents available 
to 
anyone who asks for them. Each race organization has reasons for their 
position on these issues. I hope they all have arrived at their at 
their 
conclusions with as much research and dedication as we have.

Race with your conscience. Don't go where you don't agree with what 
they are 
doing. I hope you choose our way, but I completely understand if you 
find 
another way that pleases you.

Jack Woehrle


--openmail-part-01795178-00000001--


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>