Howdy,
> Arthur Emerson wrote:
> > If I know the SCCA's rulemakers as well as I think, they deleted
> > the word "telescopic" just to give you other creative options
> > to fabricate an acceptable bar. The key is that they didn't
> > delete the part about "provided it serves no other purpose."
> > If there's any doubt in your mind (and the fact that you're
> > asking here says that you have a doubt), it's probably
> > illegal.....
Even a telescoping bar would provide some support if you wanna take it far
enough.
If it has enough rigidity to support the harness, it'll have enough to add
rigidity.
My take on it is that they want a bar that goes across behind the seats,
with no triangulation or whatever.
Mark
|