Why (respectfully) in the hell would you campaign
for TC, then proclaim not wanting to run it on a,
vehicle with half the contact patch, and often twice
the drag?????
Joe :)
rtmack wrote:
> Joe:
> since I am thinking that my own first LSR machine will likely be a bike-- and
>not
> particularly powerful by todays standards-- I will not prioritize TC for it,
>even if TC
> becomes legal. So I'm looking forward to personally experiencing what you
>are talking
> about. Kinda like going fast on firm sand? Anyway, my own bike experience
>tells me
> that a bike gives much clearer feedback than most cars-- and responds much
>more
> intuitively to the rider. Not sure I'd ever want TC on a bike, either
>(except maybe for
> a way-powerful streamliner). Hope to find out within the next year or so.
> Russ Mack
>
> Joe Amo wrote:
>
> > Actually, TC works (I mean, would likely work :):))
> > best on two wheel machines, but alas, the "little"
> > salt dance that the back end does, is a naturally
> > beautiful way for the rear to "hunt" for traction,
> > this oscillation, combined with the inherent
> > gyroscopic assistance of the rotating wheels,
> > is a simply wonderful way to communicate with
> > mother nature, and I for one appreciate mother
> > nature and her dancing rear ends
> >
> > Joe
> >
> > rtmack wrote:
> >
> > > Joe:
> > > sure. Very easy. But see the response I wrote to Kvach on this--
>problem is even
> > > worse on a bike, as I am sure you know: your focus needs to be on where
>you are
> > > going, not on your instruments.
> > > Russ Mack
> > >
> > > Joe Amo wrote:
> > >
> > > > Front tire speed vs rear tire speed
///
/// land-speed@autox.team.net mailing list
/// To unsubscribe send a plain text message to majordomo@autox.team.net
/// with nothing in it but
///
/// unsubscribe land-speed
///
/// or go to http://www.team.net/cgi-bin/majorcool
///
///
|