land-speed
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: rule changes

To: webmaster@landracing.com, rtmack@concentric.net, lsr350@hotmail.com,
Subject: Re: rule changes
From: "Jim Belford" <jimbelford@msn.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 22:19:11 -0600
Jonathan, I can understand your reasoning about the safety (or lack of) when 
fully enclosing the rear wheel but I do not see the issue with 1-2" of the 
stock seat support fairing extending beyond the rear wheel. I will probably 
take care of the situation by putting my stock exhaust back on but it does 
not make sense to me. I can change my exhaust, windshield, but my stock 
fairing is not allowed.

Jim


----Original Message Follows----
From: "Jonathan Amo" <webmaster@landracing.com>
Reply-To: "Jonathan Amo" <webmaster@landracing.com>
To: "Russel Mack" <rtmack@concentric.net>, "gary baker"  
<lsr350@hotmail.com>,   <land-speed@autox.team.net>
Subject: Re: rule changes
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 18:56:34 -0600

Well I can tell you the reason for the rule. This creates more of a surface
area, thus wind gusts can push you over. It is a safety factor in enclosing
rear wheel and adding more surface area. That is what I was told by the
"motorcycle techs." The ventelation of the rear rim proves a safety reason
also, as with the front wheel.
Charlie Toy have a partially enclosed front wheel on a killer fairing and
had handeling problems. He cut out slots in the front fairing and It went
away. But then again Team Elves bike had an enclosed front wheel as per the
rules and they did just fine.
The rule will never change, EVER. The reason is the past runners have not
been able to use that rule to set their records. So a way to preserve the
feat of bonneville they really wont do it. Never hurts to bring it up at the
Motorcycle meeting during bonneville.

Now Russ we can include John W in this with his Kawi because his was a
different rule. The 36" rule he was having trouble with.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Russel Mack" <rtmack@concentric.net>
To: "gary baker" <lsr350@hotmail.com>; <land-speed@autox.team.net>
Sent: Sunday, June 15, 2003 10:25 PM
Subject: RE: rule changes


 > Good question, Gary.  I'd like to know the answer, too.
 >
 > The SCTA rules for partial streamlined/ modified bike have become so
friggin
 > conservative that some sportbikes with STOCK bodywork can't pass (like 
Jon
 > W.'s big Kawi at World Finals last year).
 >
 > How does that make sense????
 > Russ, #1226B

_________________________________________________________________
STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE*  

///  unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net  or try
///  http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo
///  Archives at http://www.team.net/archive


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>