Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:jhadler@rmi.net: 280 ]

Total 280 documents matching your query.

21. Re: dominant cars in "new" HS? (score: 1)
Author: Josh Hadler <jhadler@rmi.net>
Date: Fri, 05 Nov 1999 16:02:48 -0700
'87.5 Audi Coupe GT. (FWD) Great motor, 2.3L I5, 130 HP, 140 lbft. 14x6 wheels, very nice handling, and it looks nice too. If I had the money, I'd be looking for one. -Josh2 -- Joshua Hadler '74 914
/html/autox/1999-11/msg00261.html (9,061 bytes)

22. Re: New scoring system (score: 1)
Author: Josh Hadler <jhadler@rmi.net>
Date: Mon, 08 Nov 1999 14:45:30 -0700
It's true, that does suck. Even a single cone on one day can mean the difference between a top placing run in the trophies and being an also-ran. And while I agree that it really bites to be on the s
/html/autox/1999-11/msg00327.html (9,348 bytes)

23. Re: Scoring System (score: 1)
Author: Josh Hadler <jhadler@rmi.net>
Date: Mon, 08 Nov 1999 15:59:29 -0700
That would entail a points scoring system instead of raw times. What would be the points basis then? Considering that there are sometimes more 40 people in a single class? Would it be an FIA style po
/html/autox/1999-11/msg00337.html (10,305 bytes)

24. Re: Rules Questions (score: 1)
Author: Josh Hadler <jhadler@rmi.net>
Date: Mon, 08 Nov 1999 16:02:54 -0700
First off, "Trunk kits" are not legal in Solo2 stock category competition. Second, unless they are -factory- items that could order from ANY dealer and have the car delivered from the -factory- in th
/html/autox/1999-11/msg00338.html (8,975 bytes)

25. Re: Rules Questions (score: 1)
Author: Josh Hadler <jhadler@rmi.net>
Date: Mon, 08 Nov 1999 16:47:17 -0700
Makes sense. I think that it's in addition, and superceeding in some cases, to the SP rules set. -Josh2 -- Joshua Hadler '74 914 2.0 CSP/Bi - Hooligan Racing #29 - CONIVOR '87 Quantum Syncro - aka st
/html/autox/1999-11/msg00344.html (8,141 bytes)

26. Re: New scoring system (score: 1)
Author: Josh Hadler <jhadler@rmi.net>
Date: Mon, 08 Nov 1999 16:47:58 -0700
Yeah, but in some cases, that person may actually merit a higher place trophy with their combined times than with a scaled points total. In my DSP example, the 9th and 10th place cars take 7th and 8t
/html/autox/1999-11/msg00345.html (8,052 bytes)

27. Re: Mulligans (score: 1)
Author: Josh Hadler <jhadler@rmi.net>
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 1999 13:59:25 -0700
Would those mulligan points count towards DNF cones? Cutting off a particular apex cone might prove excessively beneficial. Agreed. Unless the cone's name happens to be "Kenny". :-) -Josh2 -- Joshua
/html/autox/1999-11/msg00521.html (7,775 bytes)

28. Re: Diamond Racing (score: 1)
Author: Josh Hadler <jhadler@rmi.net>
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 1999 14:00:24 -0700
Diamond Industries: 800-937-4407 Ask for Bill. -Josh2 -- Joshua Hadler '74 914 2.0 CSP/Bi - Hooligan Racing #29 - CONIVOR '87 Quantum Syncro - aka stealth quattro jhadler@rmi.net http://rainbow.rmi.n
/html/autox/1999-11/msg00522.html (6,530 bytes)

29. Re: STU and Subframe Connectors, Etc (score: 1)
Author: Josh Hadler <jhadler@rmi.net>
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 1999 14:52:40 -0700
RX-7tt: 2-Seater Vette: 2-Seater Neither are legal in the class. The car has to have 4 seats. And the 911 is out of the picture because of the front engine requirement. I hate to say it, but I think
/html/autox/1999-11/msg00532.html (8,942 bytes)

30. Re: Roll Bar and Removal of Rear seats (score: 1)
Author: Josh Hadler <jhadler@rmi.net>
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 1999 16:09:45 -0700
Yes, it must be bolt in. Because your car (civic) is not considered an open top car, that is the only requirement you must meet that is specific to roll bars. However, you may not perform any unautho
/html/autox/1999-11/msg00539.html (7,250 bytes)

31. Re: SM 323GTX? (score: 1)
Author: Josh Hadler <jhadler@rmi.net>
Date: Fri, 12 Nov 1999 16:08:52 -0700
Yeah, but it still weighs almost 1000lbs more than an early CRX. Talons are around 3100-3200 lbs. The top CRXen from CSP are weighing in at 1600lbs even, and they're legal. That's -LIGHT-. And that w
/html/autox/1999-11/msg00629.html (7,449 bytes)

32. Re: SM 323GTX? (score: 1)
Author: Josh Hadler <jhadler@rmi.net>
Date: Fri, 12 Nov 1999 16:34:53 -0700
== STU.10 ENGINE AND DRIVE TRAIN A. Subject to the following limitations, all engine and drivetrain modifications (including supercharging turbocharging) are unrestricted. (This includes camshafts, h
/html/autox/1999-11/msg00637.html (8,490 bytes)

33. Re: Hood Pins in SP? (score: 1)
Author: Josh Hadler <jhadler@rmi.net>
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 1999 15:37:04 -0700
That's a good question Jason. I seem to remember that the SP rules allowed hood pins, but I can't find it right now. But if they are allowed, can one remove the original factory hood release mechanis
/html/autox/1999-11/msg00961.html (7,723 bytes)

34. Re: Hood Pins in SP? (score: 1)
Author: Josh Hadler <jhadler@rmi.net>
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 1999 17:38:01 -0700
Yeah, but does it imply that the factory release mechanism can be removed? I don't think it can. But I'll bet that a well worded letter to the SEB could help that little allowance along. -Josh2 -- Jo
/html/autox/1999-11/msg00971.html (7,396 bytes)

35. Re: Stock rear swaybar leagality question (score: 1)
Author: Josh Hadler <jhadler@rmi.net>
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 1999 16:55:03 -0700
I think it's only legal if there's a Toyota (in this case) paper trail to prove that it's an authorized substitution. And I doubt it would be weenie if those endlinks stiffened up the rear bar, even
/html/autox/1999-11/msg01020.html (9,044 bytes)

36. Re: best way to clean windshield? (score: 1)
Author: Josh Hadler <jhadler@rmi.net>
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 1999 16:52:33 -0700
Especially if you have a zero deductible glass coverage. That's what I have, and it's paid for itself and then some. 2 new fog light lenses (yes, -all- glass), one new headlight, and a new windshield
/html/autox/1999-11/msg01021.html (7,942 bytes)

37. Re: best way to clean windshield? (score: 1)
Author: Joshua Hadler <jhadler@rmi.net>
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 1999 23:15:13 -0700
My claim was nothing more than my experience. Yes, it would be unwise to abuse that policy. But I probably will go thru another one or two foglight lenses this winter, and likely will need a new wind
/html/autox/1999-11/msg01047.html (7,910 bytes)

38. Re: A friendly tip (score: 1)
Author: Josh Hadler <jhadler@rmi.net>
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 1999 16:13:42 -0700
If your fog lights are aimed properly, they won't blind anyone. Unless you're cresting a hill... I've found alot of drivers have their fog lights aimed like driving lights. So high that they -do- shi
/html/autox/1999-11/msg01168.html (8,641 bytes)

39. Re: A friendly tip (score: 1)
Author: Josh Hadler <jhadler@rmi.net>
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 1999 14:21:25 -0700
Absolutely. I run my foglights pointed outwards by about 15-20 degrees. It really helps seeing through the turns on unlit tight and twisty roads (like mine). And John's comment about avoiding deer is
/html/autox/1999-11/msg01221.html (8,422 bytes)

40. What would YOU buy? (score: 1)
Author: Josh Hadler <jhadler@rmi.net>
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 1999 15:42:44 -0700
Ok gang, And now for something completely different... and getting off some of these other off-season threads. I have a friend who is looking around for a convertible sports car that will be driven p
/html/autox/1999-11/msg01231.html (8,271 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 40
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14]
This search system is powered by Namazu