>Date: Sun, 19 Sep 1999 22:40:11 -0700
>From: Rex Tener <firstname.lastname@example.org>
>Subject: Re: Katie Kelly protested?
>At 08:28 PM 9/19/99 -0500, Rocky Entriken wrote:
>>What seems kind of a bummer is the protestor was Kevin McCormick, also a San
>>Francisco Region member who Katie runs against all year at their local
>>events, including at the NPDiv Divisional. IMHO, the sportsmanlike thing
>>would have been to raise the question at any of a number of opportunities
>>back home, not wait to ambush her half a continent away at the premier event
>>of the year.
>What is a real bummer is the number of people, like you, or even some that
>weren't even at nationals, that are condeming Kevin McCormick without ever
>hearing his side of the story/protest. As I learned a long time ago in
>this sport, there are two sides to every protest.
Ok, Rex, let's hear you interpret this:
overheard explanation by McCormick: the protest was "for clarification
purposes" specifically on perch settings/ride height.
ok.....if that were true...why the timing protest?
yes, there are 2 sides. unfortunately his still sucked.
pics soon! *hee*
the M road
tel : (512) 9 9 0 - 8 2 1 1
fax : (603) 6 9 7 - 6 3 3 6
solo dos bs 99 <><