Wont we be soon, or maybe already at a point where it will be more costly to
make
things OLD again, with respect to ignitions and fuel systems? Or is it a moot
point as reconditioning old cylinder heads and blocks can already by costly
compared to newer stuff? Joe :) :)
V4GR@aol.com wrote:
> --part1_30.6701415.267910b3_boundary
>
>
>
> --part1_30.6701415.267910b3_boundary
> Content-Disposition: inline
>
> Return-path: <V4GR@aol.com>
> From: V4GR@aol.com
> Full-name: V4GR
> Message-ID: <1e.68d1869.26791077@aol.com>
> Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2000 12:44:39 EDT
> Subject: Re: New Category
> To: dwarner@electrorent.com
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> X-Mailer: AOL 5.0 for Windows sub 81
>
> Dan; Yes Kugel, Macdoland, and a few others would be changed out of the
> altered class I'm in. It would seem that Larry Climbie's GTO would be a car
> that would benefit from this new class. But in truth his car would still be
> giving away to much to Camaros and Firebirds just as it is now. So what's the
> harm in having a bunch of new classes. Nothing I guess. I do think the no
> crank trigger has no reasoning behind it. What do you see as a benefit for
> the membership by ruling against crank trigger ignitions? Rich Fox
>
> --part1_30.6701415.267910b3_boundary--
|