autox
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: SCCA Membership - 18% increase

To: "John Lieberman" <johnlee@softdisk.com>
Subject: Re: SCCA Membership - 18% increase
From: "Bruce Wentzel" <greendotracing@netzero.net>
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2002 17:31:35 -0500
That's what I recalled reading in FasTrack. Might have recalled wrong. From
other conversations, it seems that there are mixed messages out there.
FWIW, I have been very favorably impressed with Steve Johnson.
'DOT
----- Original Message -----
From: "John Lieberman" <johnlee@softdisk.com>
To: "Bruce Wentzel" <greendotracing@netzero.net>
Cc: "team.net" <autox@autox.team.net>
Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 5:23 PM
Subject: Re: SCCA Membership - 18% increase


> I don't know where that info came from, "Dot," but it's certainly not
> what I remember hearing at the National Convention in February.  (No
> flame intended by that statement!!!)
>
> Obviously this would be more official coming from Steve Johnson or a
> member of the BOD.  But, as I understand it from what was said in
> Denver, there's more than enough money in the pot right now - from the
> sale of our existing building in Englewood/Centennial - to cover the
> cost of the move to Topeka.  We're getting a huge amount of help from
> the city of Topeka and the MTAA to design and build the new HQ.  So the
> move would certainly represent a cost savings in that respect.
>
> The dues increase, as I understand it, is just to get us out of the red
> and into the black when it comes to operating all of the many facets of
> SCCA on a day-by-day basis.  I could be wrong, but that's the way I
> understand it.
>
> Before anybody decides to flame me for that statement, please do your
> homework.  (And then let us ALL know what you find out!)  It never
> ceases to amaze me how much time is wasted on this list by so many
> people batting around an issue and speculating on its origin or intent
> rather than just going straight to someone who should know the answer
> and asking the question.  IMNSHO, this list should not be a source of
> answers for administrative questions but, rather, a place to share the
> information we've learned about our questions from the proper sources.
>
> John (Old Fartz & TLS #37) Lieberman
>
>
> Bruce Wentzel wrote:
> >
> > The only thing that bothers me is that it is being ascribed to the
> > relocation to Topeka, but that was sold in part as a significant cost
> > savings.
> > Bruce

///  unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net  or try
///  http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo
///  Partial archives at http://www.team.net/archive


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>