Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*AP\s+Nationals\s+Turnout\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*AP\s+Nationals\s+Turnout\s*$/: 28 ]

Total 28 documents matching your query.

1. RE: AP Nationals Turnout (score: 1): Author: Andy Hollis <awhollis@swbell.net>; Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2002 06:50:45 -0500; Poor choice of words on my part, Rick. Sorry. :-/ By "real AP cars" I meant those cars that are specifically classed. Right under the AP category header that says "unlimited FI or Carburetion". The C; /html/autox/2002-10/msg00001.html (8,609 bytes)
2. Fw: AP Nationals Turnout (score: 1): Author: "Tom Holt" <tholt@ccsi.com>; Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2002 08:13:44 -0500; By moving the Miatas out of DP and into AP, you take the second healthiest class in Prepared and whittle it down to being just above the minimum levels. Now you have a 4th class in Prepared on the ve; /html/autox/2002-10/msg00004.html (9,097 bytes)
3. Re: AP Nationals Turnout (score: 1): Author: Andy Hollis <awhollis@swbell.net>; Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2002 08:43:50 -0500; 1650 and 1750 are the numbers I've heard for AP. It And why wouldn't adding weight to it and leaving in DP not also fix that problem? Certainly cheaper for the Miata driver than upgrading to AP specs; /html/autox/2002-10/msg00006.html (9,142 bytes)
4. Re: AP Nationals Turnout (score: 1): Author: "Mark J. Andy" <marka@telerama.com>; Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2002 10:56:47 -0400 (EDT); Given what Rocky (I think) said about the roadracing weight for the miata being higher than the current DP weight, wouldn't adding weight to the miata also make it easier to "dual purpose"? Obviousl; /html/autox/2002-10/msg00010.html (8,464 bytes)
5. Re: AP Nationals Turnout (score: 1): Author: "Martin, William A" <MartinWA2@navair.navy.mil>; Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2002 11:34:46 -0700; I find it interesting that the rationale for putting the Miata into AP is it's similarity to a Lotus, when for the most part the Lotus's have been driven out of AP by the GT cars. Not that there were; /html/autox/2002-10/msg00021.html (9,462 bytes)
6. Re: AP Nationals Turnout (score: 1): Author: "Steve Hudson" <smhudson@austin.rr.com>; Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2002 15:07:57 -0500; The issue of rules stability is vital for increasing participation in the prepared class. I purchased my Miata last year and over the winter began building it into a DP car. Going in I knew this woul; /html/autox/2002-10/msg00028.html (9,854 bytes)
7. Re: AP Nationals Turnout (score: 1): Author: "Rocky Entriken" <rocky@tri.net>; Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2002 16:05:17 -0500; Now almost Whoops, quite right. Okay, take the cones off Sam, and the Miata would still have been a trophy third. And the other one a trophy fifth. Actually, that's why I personally think FP is the h; /html/autox/2002-10/msg00030.html (10,263 bytes)
8. Re: AP Nationals Turnout (score: 1): Author: "Mark J. Andy" <marka@telerama.com>; Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2002 17:20:50 -0400 (EDT); At what cost to the miata owners? Is it fair to take someone that built a car to the rules and is currently winning and toss them into a new class where they're gonna be 1.5 seconds back from the le; /html/autox/2002-10/msg00031.html (8,824 bytes)
9. Re: AP Nationals Turnout (score: 1): Author: "George and Jan Ryan" <gryan3@mindspring.com>; Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2002 05:24:57 -0500; Unfortunately, Steve, you may be right. It is truly a "Welcome to Prepared" that you are experiencing. My Fiero was moved back and forth from originally E-Mod, to F- Prepared, to A-Prepared, back to; /html/autox/2002-10/msg00053.html (13,287 bytes)
10. Re: AP Nationals Turnout (score: 1): Author: "Steve Hudson" <smhudson@austin.rr.com>; Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2002 07:25:15 -0500; your Thanks. either. My understanding is that all three proposals (stay in DP, move to AP or EP) will be published in Fastrack for member comment. And yes the AP rules are goofy. although (and two I; /html/autox/2002-10/msg00055.html (12,396 bytes)
11. Re: AP Nationals Turnout (score: 1): Author: "Dave Whitworth" <dave@wcsllc.net>; Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2002 07:40:51 -0500; That is what these member comment things are all about...... More people (myself included) need to write letters voicing their opinions on these Fastrack proposals more often. Don't be afraid, don't; /html/autox/2002-10/msg00057.html (9,183 bytes)
12. Re: AP Nationals Turnout (score: 1): Author: Smokerbros@aol.com; Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2002 09:20:00 EDT; And remember, if you LIKE a proposal, write with your support. Those who DON'T like it will usually write with their objections! CHD /// unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.ne; /html/autox/2002-10/msg00059.html (8,856 bytes)
13. Re: AP Nationals Turnout (score: 1): Author: "Dave Whitworth" <dave@wcsllc.net>; Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2002 08:25:36 -0500; DON'T like it will usually write with their objections! Definitely--don't assume that "someone else" will do it.... DaveW Don't be afraid, don't be embarrassed....voice your opinion! Without your op; /html/autox/2002-10/msg00060.html (9,181 bytes)
14. Re: AP Nationals Turnout (score: 1): Author: LOTUSRCN@aol.com; Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2002 14:53:58 EDT; Ok.. here is my take on this whole AP mess. Being Lotus Elan driver in AP when FP and AP were combined in 1999 , then in 2000 after the rule changes that split the class up. Here are a couple of poin; /html/autox/2002-10/msg00077.html (9,471 bytes)
15. Re: AP Nationals Turnout (score: 1): Author: "Rocky Entriken" <rocky@tri.net>; Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2002 15:21:27 -0500; First of all Steve, I am sorry you are caught in this crack. It is not your fault. You are doing what you are supposed to be able to do. Frankly, I think the whole thing is a total cock-up. There was; /html/autox/2002-10/msg00086.html (12,710 bytes)
16. Re: AP Nationals Turnout (score: 1): Author: "Rocky Entriken" <rocky@tri.net>; Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2002 16:37:29 -0500; I didn't delete that danged tail last time, so Steve saw and answered my last post before anyone else saw it. Just re-sent it to the list. Just a couple comments on Steve's replies. On from fully Yes; /html/autox/2002-10/msg00099.html (16,659 bytes)
17. Re: AP Nationals Turnout (score: 1): Author: "Rocky Entriken" <rocky@tri.net>; Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2002 16:43:11 -0500; Nowadays it is as easy as putting seb@scca.org in your address book, clicking on it and writing "I like the proposal to [whatever], please adopt it." --Rocky who dave@wcsllc.net the "the who /// unsu; /html/autox/2002-10/msg00100.html (9,484 bytes)
18. Re: AP Nationals Turnout (score: 1): Author: LOTUSRCN@aol.com; Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2002 14:35:24 EDT; With the current rules there is a disadvantages for the smaller cars (Miata, Lotus, MG, et...) My feeling is let the small cars go to a 8" rim, Be it a 13 X 8 through 16 X 8. Maybe we would get more; /html/autox/2002-10/msg00119.html (8,399 bytes)
19. AP Nationals Turnout (score: 1): Author: JDMurphy47@aol.com; Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2002 21:23:25 EDT; The rumor I heard is that the DP Miata's will be moved to AP next year - this should help AP's numbers. Jim /// unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net or try /// http://www.t; /html/autox/2002-09/msg00491.html (7,350 bytes)
20. Re: AP Nationals Turnout (score: 1): Author: "Mark J. Andy" <marka@telerama.com>; Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2002 22:46:23 -0400 (EDT); Not if I had a DP Miata it wouldn't. (though one assumes weight will be taken from the car, etc.) Mark /// unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net or try /// http://www.team.; /html/autox/2002-09/msg00492.html (7,656 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]