Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Thoughts\s+on\s+new\s+B\-stock\s*$/: 19 ]

Total 19 documents matching your query.

1. Thoughts on new B-stock (score: 1)
Author: "Burns, James B." <James.Burns@jhuapl.edu>
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2002 10:00:27 -0500
In looking at the Pro and Tour events results so far this year, it looks to me as if this class has been ruined by the decision to put the S2000 into BS instead of AS. It looks to be almost a spec S2
/html/autox/2002-03/msg00446.html (9,051 bytes)

2. Re: Thoughts on new B-stock (score: 1)
Author: Scott Troyer - TestEng DRAM Repair <stroyer@micron.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2002 08:53:58 -0700
I don't know if you noticed or not, but this years BS is pretty much the same class as last years AS with a couple of additions (SS Camaro, WS6 Firebird, ..). So are you then saying that last years A
/html/autox/2002-03/msg00449.html (10,289 bytes)

3. RE: Thoughts on new B-stock (score: 1)
Author: "Burns, James B." <James.Burns@jhuapl.edu>
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2002 11:14:05 -0500
Scott, you are correct. As I said, I was thinking of the "good old days", as in pre-Boxster and pre-S2000. I do understand that a lot of thought and analysis went into the classing of these cars, and
/html/autox/2002-03/msg00450.html (12,273 bytes)

4. Re: Thoughts on new B-stock (score: 1)
Author: Rex Tener <rex_tener@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2002 08:41:54 -0800
Yes, it was one of the most diverse, but you are definitely reminiscing about the A-Stock glory years from 1995 to 1999. Those days are long gone and will never be back even if you make the same clas
/html/autox/2002-03/msg00451.html (9,367 bytes)

5. Re: Thoughts on new B-stock (score: 1)
Author: "gs96" <gs96@sgi.net>
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2002 11:54:25 -0500
Brad, you're right - the old AS was a fun class to watch. I can understand and support moving the Boxster and S2000 to AS, but why would you want to move the C4 Corvette back to SS where it will sure
/html/autox/2002-03/msg00452.html (14,025 bytes)

6. Re: Thoughts on new B-stock (score: 1)
Author: lundgrenj@groupbuycenter.com (Jeff Lundgren)
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2002 09:49:04 -0700
One I idea I've had, I'm sure it's not new... is to PAX each car, and compete with each paxed time, so there are no classes, just cars with individual PAX times. I'm sure it's way to radical of a cha
/html/autox/2002-03/msg00453.html (8,320 bytes)

7. Re: Thoughts on new B-stock (score: 1)
Author: Scott Troyer - TestEng DRAM Repair <stroyer@micron.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2002 09:52:15 -0700
I think I can speak for pretty much all C4 Corvette owners when I say that moving the C4 corvette back into SS would be a bad idea as the C4 is completely not competitive in SS. I know, I was there.
/html/autox/2002-03/msg00454.html (10,402 bytes)

8. RE: Thoughts on new B-stock (score: 1)
Author: "Linnhoff, Eric" <elinnhoff@smmc.saint-lukes.org>
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2002 11:19:20 -0600
--Original Message-- One I idea I've had, I'm sure it's not new... is to PAX each car, and compete with each paxed time, so there are no classes, just cars with individual PAX times. == Better yet, w
/html/autox/2002-03/msg00455.html (9,205 bytes)

9. Re: Thoughts on new B-stock (score: 1)
Author: "Patrick Washburn" <washburn@dwave.net>
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2002 12:19:37 -0600
What are you trying to do....make us like NASCAR? ;) On the outside, this sounds like a neat and simple way to make all things good. Look just a little under the surface, and it goes to hell real qui
/html/autox/2002-03/msg00458.html (9,723 bytes)

10. RE: Thoughts on new B-stock (score: 1)
Author: "Burns, James B." <James.Burns@jhuapl.edu>
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2002 13:33:04 -0500
That's a good point. I'm not really saying it needs to be the same cars as it was in '95-99. I just thought that the purpose of the reclassing was to give more cars a place to play (especially the c
/html/autox/2002-03/msg00459.html (10,934 bytes)

11. RE: Thoughts on new B-stock (score: 1)
Author: "Burns, James B." <James.Burns@jhuapl.edu>
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2002 13:39:28 -0500
I agree that the C4 wouldn't be competitive in SS, but that doesn't necessarily mean that putting it there is a bad idea since it might help give more cars a place to play. The RX7 isn't competitive
/html/autox/2002-03/msg00460.html (9,023 bytes)

12. Re: Thoughts on new B-stock (score: 1)
Author: lundgrenj@groupbuycenter.com (Jeff Lundgren)
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2002 11:44:55 -0700
Actually I like it the way it is. But then I drive one of the so called Spec cars... though I don't drive it as fast as the top drivers would. this though!) do /// unsubscribe/change address requests
/html/autox/2002-03/msg00461.html (10,112 bytes)

13. Re: Thoughts on new B-stock (score: 1)
Author: "Phillip Osborne" <psosborn@gte.net>
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2002 12:35:29 -0500
Oops, looks like Linnhoff woke up on the "left" side of the bed this try /// unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net or try /// http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo /// Partia
/html/autox/2002-03/msg00462.html (10,296 bytes)

14. Re: Thoughts on new B-stock (score: 1)
Author: Scott Troyer - TestEng DRAM Repair <stroyer@micron.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2002 12:19:19 -0700
Brad, Please forgive me if I'm a little dense, but how will moving the C4 corvette back into SS help your situation in BS? Scott /// unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net or
/html/autox/2002-03/msg00463.html (9,112 bytes)

15. RE: Thoughts on new B-stock (score: 1)
Author: "Burns, James B." <James.Burns@jhuapl.edu>
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2002 14:35:11 -0500
It wouldn't help BS, but it might give the rest of the cars in AS a place where they can be competitive instead of having another spec class. Brad B. /// unsubscribe/change address requests to major
/html/autox/2002-03/msg00464.html (8,685 bytes)

16. Re: Thoughts on new B-stock (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Goeke" <teamnet@hedlygoeke.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2002 12:04:36 -0800
I could see this coming a mile away ;-), even from last year this time ;-) Before we all go shouting "the s2000 is to fast for BS" chant, let's look at the situation here. First of all, on course lik
/html/autox/2002-03/msg00465.html (13,205 bytes)

17. RE: Thoughts on new B-stock (score: 1)
Author: Bob Pariza <bpariza@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2002 12:09:46 -0800 (PST)
I'm sure most of us don't "need" a trophy to urge us out of bed on Sunday mornings, but the chase seems to be a lot more fun (and interesting) when there's something to chase... "Linnhoff, Eric" <eli
/html/autox/2002-03/msg00466.html (8,649 bytes)

18. RE: Thoughts on new B-stock (score: 1)
Author: "Burns, James B." <James.Burns@jhuapl.edu>
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2002 15:26:35 -0500
Good points, Joe. Thanks. I've always thought of spec classes as bad, but you've got me thinking that maybe they aren't so bad if they are affordable and have good participation. Do you think the int
/html/autox/2002-03/msg00468.html (11,916 bytes)

19. Re: Thoughts on new B-stock (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Goeke" <teamnet@hedlygoeke.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2002 20:21:49 -0800
A great addition. Also a perfect fit as to the type, size and such. 206-295-3269 // -- Need to host a website? www.goekeweb.com // -- Room for rent! www.hedlygoeke.com/basementforrent // -- House for
/html/autox/2002-03/msg00501.html (12,772 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 19
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu