ba-autox
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: SFR rule

To: "Bay_Area_Autocross_List" <ba-autox@autox.team.net>
Subject: RE: SFR rule
From: "Navid Kahangi" <navid@interwoven.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2001 13:22:59 -0800
Not to nitpick, but an advantage is only unfair if the others have no way of
obtaining it.  Not so in this case.

--Navid

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-ba-autox@autox.team.net
> [mailto:owner-ba-autox@autox.team.net]On Behalf Of John F. Kelly Jr.
> Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 12:54 PM
> To: James Creasy; Jerry Mouton
> Cc: Bay_Area_Autocross_List
> Subject: Re: SFR rule
>
>
> -------------------- Begin Original Message --------------------
>
> Message text written by James Creasy
>
> "i was even advised by a veteran autocrosser to make use of that rule-
> specifically to gain an advantage.
>
> -james
> OSP #74"
> -------------------- End Original Message --------------------
>
> I think you should abuse the devil out of it. Then perhaps more
> people will
> realize the rule for what it is: The Unfair Advantage.
>
> While the deal was "sold" as a benefit for new drivers, one in particular,
> the ironic twist is that both folks are gone from Bay Area
> autocrosses. But
> the rule lingers on. It's LEGAL to take unfair advantage of your fellow
> competitors in order to win. The rule, alas, is not fair. IMHO, It's
> equally unfortunate the Steering Committee declines to change it.
>
> --John Kelly
>
> --John Kelly

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>